Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Am J Public Health ; 112(S8): S787-S796, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288521

RESUMEN

Objectives. To describe prevalence of breast milk feeding among people with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy and examine associations between breast milk feeding, timing of maternal infection before delivery, and rooming-in status during delivery hospitalization. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee of whether people with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy in 2020 initiated breast milk feeding at birth. Results. Among 11 114 (weighted number) people with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, 86.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82.4%, 87.6%) initiated breast milk feeding during birth hospitalization. People with infection within 14 days before delivery had significantly lower prevalence of breast milk feeding (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.83, 0.94) than did those with infection at least 14 days before delivery. When stratified by rooming-in status, the association between timing of infection and breast milk feeding remained only among infants who did not room in with their mother (APR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.68, 0.88). Conclusions. Pregnant and postpartum people with SARS-CoV-2 infection should have access to lactation support and be advised about the importance of breast milk feeding and how to safely feed their infants in the same room. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S8):S787-S796. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307023).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Leche Humana , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lactancia Materna , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología
2.
Prev Med Rep ; 26: 101738, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35242503

RESUMEN

Since the 1990 s discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in breast or ovarian cancer patients, genetic testing has been recommended as part of a targeted, individualized approach for cancer prevention and treatment in eligible individuals. The aim of this study was to assess trends in BRCA test rates and results among adult women aged 18 to 65 in the US between 2007 and 2017. Using Clinformatics© Data Mart (CDM) Electronic Health Records, we included 223,211 women 18-65 years old with documented BRCA testing results from 1/1/2007-9/30/2017. Positive results indicated the presence of pathogenic variantss. BRCA test rates increased significantly from 34 per 100,000 women in 2007 to 488 per 100,000 women in 2016 (APC 30.8, 95% confidence interval 26.6-35.1). Documented positive results decreased from 86.1% in 2007 to 78.0% in 2017(APC -0.6, 95% confidence interval -1.4-0.2). From 2007 to 2017, decreasing trends in the rates of documented positive results were observed among all three age groups (18-39, 40-54, and 55-65 years; largest in 40-54 group). In 2015-2017, women with positive test results were less likely to be non-Hispanic Whites, cancer patients, or living in the Northeast or an area with average household income ≥$50,000. Between 2007 and 2017, increasing use of BRCA testing for cancer prevention and treatment occurred, correlating to the observed decreasing documented positive test rate. The utilization of testing and corresponding test results differed significantly across races/ethnicities, suggestive of a divergent application of the same testing criteria.

3.
J Cancer Educ ; 37(2): 362-369, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32642924

RESUMEN

Knowledge, attitudes, and patient preferences about genetic testing and subsequent risk management for cancer prevention among average risk populations are understudied, especially among Hispanics. This study was to assess these items by conducting an in-person survey in this understudied population. We conducted in-person surveys using a self-administered, structured questionnaire among young women in 2017. Survey questions were adapted from other validated surveys. This study had 677 participants in the final analyses. Data were collected in 2017 and analyzed in 2018 and 2019. Participants had little knowledge about genes or breast cancer risk, but most felt that genetic testing for cancer prevention is "a good idea" (87.0%), "a reassuring idea" (84.0%), and that "everyone should get the test" (87.7%). Most (64.0%) of these women would pay up to $25 for the test, 29.3% would pay $25-$500, and < 10% would pay more than $500 for the test. When asked about a hypothetical scenario of high breast cancer risk, 34.2% Hispanics and 24.5% non-Hispanics would choose chemoprevention. Women would be less likely to choose risk reduction procedures, such as mastectomy (19.6% among Hispanics and 15.1% among non-Hispanics) and salpingo-oophorectomy (11.8% among Hispanics and 10.7% among non-Hispanics). In this low-income, mostly Hispanic population, knowledge about genetic testing and cancer risk is poor, but most have positive opinions about genetic testing for cancer prevention. However, their strong preference for chemoprevention and lesser preference for prophylactic surgeries in a hypothetical scenario underscore the importance of genetic counseling and education.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Mastectomía , Prioridad del Paciente , Gestión de Riesgos
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(1): 255-258, 2021 01 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460665

RESUMEN

Childhood vaccination is an important public health intervention, yet many children remain under-vaccinated. The objective of this study was to examine infant vaccination education preferences in a population of low-income pregnant women by ethnicity, nativity, and language. Pregnant women 14-44 y old (n = 335) attending a participating low-income reproductive health clinic in southeast Texas from May 26-July 21, 2017, and who completed a paper survey offered in English and Spanish were included. Participants were asked to complete questions about their demographic characteristics and preferences about infant vaccination education. To examine differences in vaccine education preferences by participant demographic characteristics, chi-squared tests, or Fisher's exact tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted using Stata SE Version 15.1 with α = 0.05. Nearly half (47.5%) of participants considered pregnancy the best time to get information about infant vaccination and were most likely (40.6%) to indicate the nurse who gives vaccines during pregnancy as the health-care worker with whom they would like to discuss infant vaccination. There were no demographic differences in preferred timing of vaccine education delivery or provider who delivers vaccine education. Prenatal, nurse-delivered vaccine educational programs would be well accepted in this low-income population.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Mujeres Embarazadas , Niño , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Pobreza , Embarazo , Texas , Vacunación
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(11): e2024358, 2020 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151316

RESUMEN

Importance: Genetic testing for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants has been used for targeted, individualized cancer prevention and treatment. A positive BRCA test result indicates a higher risk for developing BRCA-related cancers. During the past decade, testing criteria have loosened. The impact of these loosened criteria on BRCA testing in older women has not previously been studied. Objective: To assess whether the rate of positive BRCA test results changed between 2008 and 2018 among older women in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a 10% random sample of women 65 years of age or older from Optum's deidentified Integrated Claims-Clinical data set (2008-2018), a large national electronic health record data set. A total of 5533 women with BRCA test results from January 1, 2008, to March 31, 2018, were evaluated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual percentage change in positive BRCA test results was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between positive test results and race/ethnicity, region of residence, income, educational level, and personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. Results: Of 5533 women 65 years of age or older (mean age, 68.1 years [95% CI, 67.9-68.4 years]) who underwent BRCA testing from 2008 to 2018, most (4679 [84.6%]) were non-Hispanic White women, and 1915 (34.6%) resided in the Midwest. Positive BRCA test results decreased from 85.7% (36 of 42) in 2008 to 55.6% (140 of 252) in 2018 (annual percentage change, -2.55; 95% CI, -3.45 to -1.64). Among patients with breast or ovarian cancer, positive test results decreased from 83.3% (20 of 24) in 2008 to 61.6% (61 of 99) in 2018, while among women without breast or ovarian cancer, positive test results decreased from 87.5% (21 of 24) in 2008 to 48.4% (74 of 153) in 2018 (annual percentage change, -3.17 vs -2.49; P = .29). Women with positive test results were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black women, to live in the West or South, to live in areas with a low percentage of college graduates, or to not have a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that there was a significantly decreasing rate of positive BRCA test results among women 65 years of age or older. Socioeconomic and regional disparities in testing use remain an issue.


Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Pruebas Genéticas/tendencias , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/etnología , Población Blanca/genética , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Cancer ; 126(2): 337-343, 2020 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The discovery of the BRCA gene in the 1990s created an opportunity for individualized cancer prevention. BRCA testing in young women before cancer onset enables early detection of those with an increased cancer risk and creates an opportunity to offer lifesaving prophylactic procedures and medications. This study assessed trends in BRCA testing in women younger than 40 years without diagnosed breast or ovarian cancer (unaffected young women [UYW]) for cancer prevention between 2006 and 2017 in the United States. METHODS: This study included 93,278 adult women 18 to 65 years old with insurance claims for BRCA testing between 2006 and 2017 from the de-identified Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database. The data contained medical claims and administrative information from privately insured individuals in the United States. The proportion of BRCA testing in UYW younger than 40 years among adult women aged 18 to 65 years who received BRCA testing was assessed. RESULTS: In 2006, only 10.5% of the tests were performed in UYW. The proportion of BRCA tests performed in UYW increased significantly to 25.5% in 2017 (annual percentage change for the 2006-2017 period, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 6.4-7.3; P < .001). The increased trend in the proportion of BRCA tests in UYW significantly differed by region of residence and family history of breast or ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade, there was increased use of BRCA testing for cancer prevention. Additional efforts are needed to maximize the early detection of women with BRCA pathogenic variants so that these cancers may be prevented.


Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas/normas , Pruebas Genéticas/tendencias , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(5): 1139-1144, 2020 05 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809635

RESUMEN

Many medical students are not comfortable recommending the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine because they do not feel prepared to discuss it with their patients. A prior study demonstrated that this is particularly a problem among unvaccinated students. Our purpose was to determine if medical student attitudes and comfort with counseling could be improved by attending a single lecture delivered by an expert on the topic. To assess the effects of the educational program, we conducted pre- and posttests on medical students before and after a single lecture on HPV vaccination. Changes in items related to attitude and comfort were examined. Student characteristics associated with changes in scores were also examined and compared. A total of 256 medical students participated in the pre- and posttests. Before the lecture, students demonstrated low knowledge of HPV vaccination and did not feel comfortable counseling parents of younger patients. However, students <30 years of age demonstrated significant improvements after the lecture in comfort. Asian and Hispanic students showed the greatest improvement in comfort with counseling, as did students who reported they had not received the HPV vaccine. Attending a single lecture given by an expert can improve medical students' attitudes and comfort with HPV vaccine counseling, especially if the students were not vaccinated themselves. This study suggests that including material on HPV vaccination in the standard medical student curriculum could help increase physician recommendation for the HPV vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Estudiantes de Medicina , Consejo , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación
8.
Prev Med ; 121: 68-73, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30763628

RESUMEN

Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination and influenza vaccination are recommended during pregnancy primarily to prevent influenza and pertussis in mothers and their infants. This study examines associations between prenatal Tdap vaccination and influenza vaccination of mothers and hepatitis B vaccination of their infants. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from electronic medical records from 15,468 deliveries to 14,925 mothers occurring April 2, 2014-December 3, 2016 at a university hospital in Texas. Hepatitis B vaccine receipt in the first 3 days of life was dichotomized. Margins post-estimation commands in Stata SE 15.1 were used to obtain predicted probabilities and risk differences after estimating odds ratios in logistic regression with robust variance estimates. Adjusted models included maternal age, race/ethnicity, Medicaid use, year of delivery, parity, and gravidity. Infants of mothers who received prenatal influenza vaccination in the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 influenza seasons were more likely than those of mothers who did not to receive a hepatitis B vaccine in their first 3 days of life (adjusted risk difference (RD) 2.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.1% and RD 2.2%, 95% CI 0.9-3.5%, respectively). Hepatitis B vaccination was also higher among infants of Tdap-eligible mothers who received prenatal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy compared to those of mothers who did not (adjusted RD 9.1%, 95% CI 7.6-10.5%). Overall, prenatal vaccination was significantly associated with uptake of infant hepatitis B vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/uso terapéutico , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
9.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(1): 46-52, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30412447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids, the most common reproductive tract tumor in women, have been associated with hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Prior studies of fibroids and CVD have examined the subset of women with symptomatic fibroids who undergo hysterectomy, itself a risk factor for CVD. We aimed to study the risk of subclinical CVD, as determined by coronary artery calcification (CAC), carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), and left ventricular (LV) mass, in women with ultrasound-diagnosed uterine fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were 972 women from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, a cohort recruited in 1985-1986. CARDIA screened black and white women aged 35-49 years by ultrasound for fibroids at 16 years of follow-up (2002-2004). Demographics and CVD risk factors were collected in 2000-2001 at 15 years of follow-up (baseline for this analysis). Women were tested at years 15, 20, and 25 for CAC, at year 20 for CIMT, and at year 25 for echocardiographic LV mass. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of CAC, CIMT, and LV mass. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of women had fibroids (61.7% in black, 38.3% in white women). Most CVD risk factors were more common in women with fibroids. Adjusted odds of subclinical CVD, such as elevated CIMT and elevated LV mass, were not different for women with fibroids compared with those without (CIMT odds ratio [OR] = 1.03; confidence interval [95% CI] 0.7-1.5 and LV mass OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.77-1.68), when adjusted for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Although women with fibroids had more CVD risk factors, presence of fibroids was not associated with subclinical CVD.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Vasos Coronarios , Leiomioma , Calcificación Vascular , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Leiomioma/complicaciones , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Leiomioma/epidemiología , Ultrasonografía , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/epidemiología , Blanco
10.
Vaccine ; 37(4): 595-601, 2019 01 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30580838

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is expected to reduce HPV-related disease and cancer in the US. However, many parents are hesitant to obtain the vaccine for their children. The purpose of this study is to examine how the reasons for refusing the HPV vaccine vary across regions of the US, across time, and by race/ethnicity. METHODS: This study used data on 13-17 year old adolescents collected by the National Immunization Survey - Teen (NIS-Teen) annually between 2008 and 2016. We evaluated the frequencies of parents who did not intend to vaccinate their children in the next year among unvaccinated children. Among these non-intenders, we evaluated how reasons for HPV vaccine hesitancy changed across time, by region of the US, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The proportion of non-intenders among unvaccinated decreased from 72% in 2010 to 58% in 2016. The most frequent reason for vaccine hesitancy was that parents felt HPV vaccination was not necessary (22.4%), followed by lack of provider recommendation (16.2%), and lack of knowledge (15.6%). Lack of provider recommendation increased in frequency as a reason for HPV vaccine hesitancy until 2012, then decreased in frequency through 2016. Cost was one reason that was elevated in all regions compared to the Northeast. Black non-intenders were less likely to report safety, costs, or their children's fear as reasons for not intending to vaccinate their children compared to white non-intenders. Hispanic non-intenders were more likely to report lack of knowledge and that the vaccine is not a school requirement as reasons not to vaccinate their children compared to white non-intenders. CONCLUSIONS: National advocacy for improving provider recommendation for HPV vaccination likely contributed to a sharp decline in HPV vaccine hesitancy due to lack of provider recommendation. Results indicate the need for multifaceted interventions to increase HPV vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Padres/psicología , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Femenino , Geografía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 27(5): 640-645, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29323605

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the obstetric and procedural outcomes of traditional surrogates and gestational carriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants included 222 women living in the United States who completed a brief online survey between November 2015 and February 2016. Differences between gestational carriers (n = 204) and traditional surrogates (n = 18) in demographic characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and procedural outcomes were examined using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and t-tests. RESULTS: Out of 248 eligible respondents, 222 surveys were complete, for a response rate of 89.5%. Overall, obstetric outcomes were similar among gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. Traditional surrogates were more likely than gestational carriers to have a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised score of 16 or higher (37.5% vs. 4.0%). Gestational carriers reported higher mean compensation ($27,162.80 vs. $17,070.07) and were more likely to travel over 400 miles (46.0% vs. 0.0%) than traditional surrogates. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural differences, but not differences in obstetric outcomes, emerged between gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. To ensure that both traditional surrogates and gestational carriers receive optimal medical care, it may be necessary to extend practice guidelines to ensure that traditional surrogates are offered the same level of care offered to gestational carriers.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Madres Sustitutas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
12.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 98(1): 178-180, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29141747

RESUMEN

We surveyed pregnant women from the United States to assess the prevention practices they used when traveling to countries with ongoing Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks. Of the 749 who agreed to participate, 710 completed the survey's travel questions and 59 of those had traveled to a ZIKV outbreak area in the past 12 months. Only 43% of the women who had traveled to ZIKV outbreak areas reported frequently using mosquito repellant with 32% stating they did not use it at all. They also did not frequently use other recommended methods to prevent mosquito bites. With the established risks to babies born to women who contract the ZIKV during pregnancy, it is a great concern that a large number of women who travel to outbreak areas during pregnancy are not protecting themselves against mosquito bites. Pregnant women need to be educated on the importance of taking precautions.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Viaje , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , América Central/epidemiología , Colombia/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/etnología , Indias Occidentales/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología
13.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 97(1): 155-162, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28719291

RESUMEN

We administered an anonymous survey to assess knowledge, attitudes, and prevention practices related to the Zika virus among pregnant women residing in Texas. Multivariate logistic regression models controlling for age, race/ethnicity, education, and number of years in the United States assessed differences between women born in outbreak areas (N = 390) versus those born in the United States (N = 249). Results demonstrated that most women wanted more information on the Zika virus and desired to obtain it from their physician. The majority did not know that the Zika virus could be spread through sex with an asymptomatic partner or how often those infected were symptomatic. Few women took precautions to avoid mosquito bites. Only 40% reported frequently using repellent; 21% stated that cost was problematic and almost half were concerned about use during pregnancy. Three-fourths stated they would agree to vaccination, if available. Compared with U.S.-born women, those born in outbreak areas were more likely to have already discussed the Zika virus with their doctor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27, 2.71) and identify microcephaly as the most common birth defect (aOR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.78, 3.76). Moreover, women born in outbreak areas were less likely to desire to keep it a secret if they became infected (aOR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.71). This study found that, regardless of birthplace, pregnant women need more education on the Zika virus disease and assurance regarding the safety of using repellent during pregnancy. They also need financial assistance for repellent, especially if living in states where transmission by mosquitos has been reported.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Culicidae , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Repelentes de Insectos , Microcefalia/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Control de Mosquitos , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
14.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(9): 2150-2154, 2017 09 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28604258

RESUMEN

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been available for over a decade but its uptake rate is still low. To explore the relationship between the HPV vaccination status of a child and their mother's beliefs, behaviors and knowledge, we surveyed 1497 women with at least one child aged 9-17 y between September 2011 and November 2015. Physician recommendation was the most important factor associated with reported child vaccination status. Mothers who reported receiving a provider recommendation for the HPV vaccine were 32 times more likely to have a child who had been vaccinated compared with mothers who did not report provider recommendation (aOR) = 32.17; 95% CI: 21.77, 47.54). Knowing someone who had received the vaccine was also strongly associated with vaccination uptake (59% vs 12%, p < .001). Additionally, prior HPV diagnosis (aOR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.18, 3.10) and knowing someone with cervical cancer (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.89) were associated with child vaccination status. Mothers who perceived moderate to high risk for their child contracting HPV or developing genital warts or cervical cancer were more likely to report that their daughters (but not their sons) had been vaccinated.


Asunto(s)
Madres/psicología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Núcleo Familiar , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Prev Med Rep ; 7: 26-29, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28593119

RESUMEN

Zika virus transmission within and between the Americas is of global concern. This study assessed knowledge about the Zika virus among pregnant women in the United States, their travel plans to endemic areas, and whether their health care providers discussed Zika with them. This cross-sectional study used data from 492 pregnant women (18-50 years) from an online survey conducted from April 8 to July 27, 2016. Pregnant women were recruited online through Facebook, Twitter, Craigslist, and Reddit. Almost all (97.8%) participants had heard of the Zika virus, of which 71% first learned about it from the internet. Over one third of these pregnant women reported that their health providers discussed transmission of the Zika virus with them. Most respondents reported that their providers had discussed risks related to travelling to areas with Zika outbreaks. Half of the survey respondents reported that their providers gave them information about avoiding mosquito bites. Pregnant women were not concerned about Zika affecting their own health, but 34% were very or extremely concerned about it affecting their babies' health. Almost no pregnant women currently had travel plans to areas with ongoing Zika transmissions, and of the 14% who previously had plans, most (85%) cancelled their travel due to concerns about Zika. Overall, pregnant women in our sample were highly knowledgeable about Zika virus. Over one third of women received suggestions regarding prevention of Zika from their healthcare providers.

16.
Vaccine ; 35(9): 1212-1215, 2017 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161418

RESUMEN

We surveyed third-year medical students to assess whether personal vaccination status was associated with willingness to recommend the human papillomavirus vaccine to patients. A total of 231 students completed an anonymous survey evaluating their knowledge, attitudes, and personal vaccine history. Of 122 female students, 81 (66.4%) reported initiating the vaccine, as did 16 of 109 males (14.7%). Females and students ⩽25years old were more likely to be vaccinated. Knowledge did not vary by vaccination status, but anticipated behaviors did. Vaccinated students reported greater willingness to vaccinate adolescents before 15-16years of age (92.1% vs. 78.6%, p=0.008) and discuss vaccination at any type of medical visit (100% vs. 89.7%, p<0.001). Our findings suggest that prior experiences with the HPV vaccine may influence a provider's future actions. Thus, interventions that increase awareness of this relationship as well as vaccination rates among health care students may be beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudiantes de Medicina , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Vacunación , Adolescente , Concienciación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
17.
Fertil Steril ; 106(6): 1496-1502, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27565254

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess medical and psychosocial screening and evaluation received by gestational carriers and compare those using agencies to those not using agencies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 204 women who completed a survey on their experiences as gestational carriers in the United States. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-reported screening received before gestational carrier pregnancies. RESULT(S): Overall, 97.1% of gestational carriers had a complete medical evaluation and 94.6% had an evaluation or counseling by a mental health professional. Most participants indicated that they had been informed of at least some medical risks (92.6%) and psychological considerations (89.7%). Participants most often recalled being informed of the risks of multiple pregnancy (89.2%) and medical procedures and medications (87.2%), but least often recalled being informed about the risks of impact on their own employment (46.6%) and to their own children (61.3%). There were no differences in outcome measures between those using an agency and those who did not. CONCLUSION(S): Self-reported screening and evaluation was high, but still not 100% on all measures. Further education of providers regarding guidelines for the screening and evaluation of gestational carriers may be needed.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Salud Mental , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Madres Sustitutas/psicología , Adulto , Conducta Cooperativa , Consejo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
18.
Papillomavirus Res ; 2: 38-40, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27042695

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study examines within-family differences in the uptake of the HPV vaccine and HPV-related beliefs by children's sex. METHODS: From a 2011-2013 survey of mothers of children aged 9-17 years in Texas, mothers with both male and female children (n=350) were selected. RESULTS: Mothers were more likely to report having initiated and completed HPV vaccination for their daughters than sons. Mothers did not express differences by children's sex in HPV-related beliefs. Among those who had not completely vaccinated either child, mothers were more likely to report they wanted their daughters compared to sons vaccinated and were more likely to report feeling confident they could get their daughters vaccinated than their sons. CONCLUSION: In this population, mothers were more likely to report HPV vaccination of and motivation to vaccinate daughters compared to sons, although maternal beliefs about HPV did not differ by children's sex.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Madres/psicología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Pobreza , Cobertura de Vacunación , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Núcleo Familiar , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Factores Sexuales , Conducta Sexual , Texas/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control
19.
Prev Med ; 88: 8-12, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27002252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No studies have examined associations between prenatal vaccination and childhood vaccination. Mothers who refuse influenza vaccinations during pregnancy report similar attitudes and beliefs to those who refuse vaccinations for their children. The objective of this study was to examine the association between self-reported prenatal influenza vaccination and early childhood vaccination. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with existing surveillance data from 4022 mothers who responded to the 2009-2011 Minnesota Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey and child vaccination records from the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection database. The childhood vaccine series outcome included the following vaccines: diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; poliovirus; measles, mumps, and rubella; Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib); hepatitis B; varicella; and pneumococcal conjugate. To evaluate the association between self-reported prenatal influenza vaccination and early childhood vaccination, unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate log odds for childhood vaccination status, while margins post-estimation commands were used to obtain predicted probabilities and risk differences. RESULTS: Vaccine series completion was 10.86% higher (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.33%-14.40%, adjusted and weighted model) in children of mothers who had a prenatal influenza vaccine compared to those who did not. For individual vaccines in the recommended series, risk differences ranged from 7.83% (95% CI 5.37%, 10.30%) for the Hib vaccine to 10.06% (95% CI 7.29%, 12.83%) for the hepatitis B vaccine. CONCLUSION: Self-reported prenatal influenza vaccination was associated with increased early childhood vaccination. More research is needed to confirm these results and identify potential intervention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Atención Prenatal , Autoinforme , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Preescolar , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Minnesota , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación
20.
J Am Coll Health ; 62(7): 450-60, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24794417

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which personal, behavioral, and environmental factors are associated with human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted infection (HIV/STI) testing and disclosure. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred thirty HIV-negative collegiate men who have sex with men (MSM) who completed an online survey about alcohol use and sexual behavior. METHODS: Correlates of testing and disclosure significant in bivariate analyses (p < .05) were grouped into personal, behavioral, or environmental factors and entered into multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: About half of participants tested for HIV (51.9%) and for STIs (45.8%) at least annually. Over half (57.8%) of participants always/almost always discussed HIV status with new sex partners; 61.1% with new unprotected sex partners. Personal and behavioral factors (age and outness) explained differences in testing, and the behavioral factor (routine testing) explained differences in disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Collegiate MSM should be supported in coming out, encouraged to engage in routine testing, and counseled on discussing HIV/STI status with potential sex partners.


Asunto(s)
Revelación/ética , VIH , Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Universidades , Sexo Inseguro/psicología , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Asunción de Riesgos , Conducta Sexual/ética , Estudiantes/psicología , Sexo Inseguro/ética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...